Brown v. Marshall et al

Filing 65

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 06/14/11 ordering plaintiff's motion to amend his opposition toi defendants' motion for summary judgment 63 is granted. Defendants' motion for an extension of time to file a reply 64 is granted. Defendants shall file a reply to plaintiff's amended opposition, if any, on or before 06/24/11. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

TOMMY RAY BROWN,

11
12
13

Plaintiff,
vs.
G. MARSHALL, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

18

ORDER
/

16
17

No. CIV S-07-0956 MCE DAD P

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42
U.S.C. § 1983.
On May 31, 2011, plaintiff filed an opposition to defendants’ motion for summary

19

judgment. On June 3, 2011, plaintiff filed a motion to amend his opposition, together with a

20

proposed amended opposition. Good cause appearing, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion to

21

amend, and the case will proceed on his amended opposition.

22

Defendants have requested an extension of time to file a reply to plaintiff’s

23

opposition. Good cause appearing, the court will grant defendants’ motion.

24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

25

1. Plaintiff’s motion to amend his opposition to defendants’ motion for summary

26

judgment (Doc. No. 63) is granted;
1

1
2

2. Defendants’ motion for an extension of time to file a reply (Doc. No. 64) is
granted; and

3

3. Defendants shall file a reply to plaintiff’s amended opposition, if any, on or

4

before June 24, 2011.

5

DATED: June 14, 2011.

6
7
8

DAD:9
brow0956.36reply+

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2