Thomas v. Sisto et al

Filing 3

ORDER signed by Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/13/2007 CASE TRANSFERRED to the Northern District of CA. Electronic Case file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. CASE CLOSED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
(HC) Thomas v. Sisto et al Doc. 3 Case 2:07-cv-01105-LKK-DAD Document 3 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. WARDEN SISTO, et al., Respondents. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, challenging Board of Parole Hearings. The application attacks a conviction issued by the Contra Costa Superior Court. While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Contra Costa County. Id. at 499 n.15; 28 U.S.C. 2241(d). ///// ///// ///// ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CHARLES LEON THOMAS, Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-1105 LKK DAD P ORDER Case 2:07-cv-01105-LKK-DAD Document 3 Filed 06/13/2007 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAD:bb thom1105.108 Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. DATED: June 13, 2007. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?