Simmons et al v. City of Chico et al
Filing
58
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/22/10 ORDERING the deposition of Dr. Bruce Barnett may be taken after the 7/1/10 close of expert discovery, but prior to 8/1/10. The completion of this one deposition after the close of expert discovery will not impact any other scheduled dates in this matter.(Carlos, K)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
FRANCIS M. GOLDSBERRY II, SBN: 63737 FRANCIS M. GOLDSBERRY III, SBN: 178739 GOLDSBERRY, FREEMAN & GUZMAN, LLP 777 12th Street, Suite 250 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 448-0448 Facsimile: (916) 448-8628 LORI J. BARKER, SBN: 131707 OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY CITY OF CHICO Post Office Box 3420 Chico, CA 95927 Telephone: (530) 896-7600 Facsimile: (530) 895-4780 Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF CHICO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ELIZABETH JEAN SIMMONS, as Personal Representative of the Estate of James Edward Simmons; DARWIN H. SIMMONS and NINA R. SIMMONS, individually, and as Trustees of the Simmons Family Trust,
) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) CITY OF CHICO; COUNTY OF BUTTE; ) BALDWIN CONTRACTING COMPANY, ) INC., a California Corporation; VIRGINIA ) DRAKE, individually, and as Trustee of the ) Drake Revocable Trust, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ )
No.: 2:07-CV-01129 JAM-GGH STIPULATION TO MODIFY THE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER RE DEPOSITION OF DR. BRUCE BARNETT
The deposition of Dr. Bruce Barnett, who was disclosed by plaintiffs and defendant Virginia Drake as a non-retained expert, was originally noticed for March 29, 2010, and Dr. Barnett was served with a subpoena for his appearance on that date. That deposition was taken off calendar to accommodate the schedules of counsel, and Dr. Barnett agreed to appear at a rescheduled date without service of a second subpoena.
S T IP U L A T IO N
TO
MODIFY
THE STATUS
O R D E R RE D E P O S IT IO N OF D R .
(PRETRIAL SCH E D U LIN G ) BRUCE BARN E T T
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Dr. Barnett was out of town for most of May, and returned in early June. However, he leaves town again on June 29 and will not return until July 7, and his availability between now and June 29th was limited to only a few days, all of which conflict with obligations already scheduled by counsel in this matter. Therefore, the parties, through their undersigned counsel, agree that the deposition of Dr. Bruce Barnett may be taken after the July 1, 2010 close of expert discovery, but prior to August 1, 2010. The completion of this one deposition after the close of expert discovery will not impact any other scheduled dates in this matter. IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: June 22, 2010 CARR, KENNEDY, PETERSON & FROST By: /s/ Randall C. Nelson (as authorized on 6/21/10) RANDALL C. NELSON (SBN: 138298) Attorneys for Plaintiffs
DATED: June 22, 2010
GOLDSBERRY, FREEMAN & GUZMAN, LLP
By: /s/ Francis M. Goldsberry III FRANCIS M. GOLDSBERRY III (SBN: 178739) Attorneys for Defendant CITY OF CHICO DATED: June 22, 2010 PORTER SCOTT
By: /s/ Stephen E. Horan (as authorized on 6/21/10) STEPHEN E. HORAN (SBN: 125241) Attorneys for Defendant COUNTY OF BUTTE
S T IP U L A T IO N
TO
MODIFY
THE STATUS
O R D E R RE D E P O S IT IO N OF D R .
(PRETRIAL SCH E D U LIN G ) -2BRUCE BARN E T T
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DATED: June 22, 2010
SCHARFF, BRADY & VINDING
By: /s/ Michael E. Vinding (as authorized on 6/21/10) MICHAEL E. VINDING (SBN: 178359) Attorneys for Defendant BALDWIN CONTRACTING COMPANY, INC. DATED: June 22, 2010 MONTAGUE & VIGLIONE
By: /s/ John D. Montague (as authorized on 6/21/10) JOHN D. MONTAGUE (SBN: 71994) Attorneys for Defendant VIRGINIA DRAKE
ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 22, 2010
/s/ John A. Mendez JOHN A. MENDEZ JUDGE, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
S T IP U L A T IO N
TO
MODIFY
THE STATUS
O R D E R RE D E P O S IT IO N OF D R .
(PRETRIAL SCH E D U LIN G ) -3BRUCE BARN E T T
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?