Wilson v. Tilton et al

Filing 46

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 7/12/2010 ORDERING 44 Findings and Recommendations are adopted in full; Defendants' 1/26/2010 motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status and motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 27) is denied; and Defendants are ordered to file a response to plaintiff's complaint within thirty days of the date of this order. (Matson, R)

Download PDF
(PC) Wilson v. Tilton et al Doc. 46 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. JAMES TILTON, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 16, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to defendants that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Defendants have not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: ///// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DAVID WILSON, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1192 GEB DAD P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 16, 2010, are adopted in full; 2. Defendants' January 26, 2010 motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status and motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 27) is denied; and 3. Defendants are ordered to file a response to plaintiff's complaint within thirty days of the date of this order. Dated: July 12, 2010 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?