Douglas v. Teen Triumph (Human Services Projects) et al

Filing 5

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/1/09 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. Matter referred to Judge England. WITHIN ten days after being served with these f&r's, pltf may file writtenobjections with the court. (Kastilahn, A)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. TEEN TRIUMPH (HUMAN SERVICES PROJECT), et al., Defendants. / This action, in which plaintiff is proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the undersigned under Local Rule 72-302(c)(21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On January 30, 2009, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend. The order explained the complaint's deficiencies, gave plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint correcting those deficiencies, and warned plaintiff that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty-day period has expired and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the order. //// //// 1 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FLORENCE DOUGLAS, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1222 MCE EFB PS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Accordingly, it is hereby RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice, and that the Clerk be directed to close this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-110. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within ten days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: April 1, 2009.

2