United States of America v. Approximately $53,000.00 in U.S. Currency et al

Filing 5

APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR PUBLICATION signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/27/07. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
United States of America v. Approximately $53,000.00 in U.S. Currency et al Doc. 5 Case 2:07-cv-01260-EJG-EFB Document 5 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney KRISTIN S. DOOR, SBN 84307 Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916)554-2723 Attorneys for Plaintiff United States of America IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. APPROXIMATELY $53,000.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, and APPROXIMATELY $2,604.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:07-cv-01260-EJG-EFB APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR PUBLICATION The United States of America, Plaintiff herein, applies for an order of publication as follows: 1. Rule G(4) of the Supplemental Rules for Certain Admiralty and Maritime Claims (hereafter "Supplemental Rules") provides that the Plaintiff shall cause public notice of the action and arrest to be given in a newspaper of general circulation, designated by order of the Court; 2. Local Rule 83-171, Eastern District of California, provides that the Court shall designate by order the appropriate newspaper for publication; 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-01260-EJG-EFB 3. Document 5 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The defendant Approximately $53,000.00 in U.S. Currency and the defendant Approximately $2,604.00 in U.S. Currency were seized in the city of San Francisco, in San Francisco County, California. The Drug Enforcement Administration ("DEA") published notice of the nonjudicial forfeiture of the defendant Approximately $53,000.00 in U.S. Currency on April 2, 9 and 16, 2007 in the Wall Street Journal. The DEA published notice of the nonjudicial forfeiture of the defendant Approximately $2,604.00 in U.S. Currency (hereafter collectively referred to as "defendant currency") on April 9, 16, and 23, 2007 in the Wall Street Journal. 4. Plaintiff proposes that publication be made as follows: a. b. One publication; In the following newspaper, a legal newspaper of general circulation, located in the county in which the defendant currency was seized: The Recorder; c. The publication is to include the following: (1) (2) (3) The Court, title and number of the action; The date of the arrest/seizure; The identity and/or description of the property arrested/seized; (4) The name, address, and telephone number of the attorney for the Plaintiff; (5) A statement that claims of persons entitled to possession or claiming an interest pursuant to Supplemental Rule G(5) must be filed with the Clerk and served on the attorney for the Plaintiff within 30 days after the date of publication; (6) A statement that answers to the Complaint or 2 Case 2:07-cv-01260-EJG-EFB Document 5 Filed 06/28/2007 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Fed. R. Civ. P.") must be filed and served within 20 days after the filing of the claims and, in the absence thereof, default may be entered and condemnation ordered; (7) A statement that applications for intervention under Fed. R. Civ. P., Rule 24 by persons claiming maritime liens or other interests shall be filed within the 30 days allowed for claims for possession; and (8) The name, address, and telephone number of the U.S. Marshal and/or Department of Treasury. Dated: June 26, 2007 McGREGOR W. SCOTT United States Attorney /s/ Kristin S. Door KRISTIN S. DOOR Assistant United States Attorney ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 27, 2007 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?