Maes v. Chrones et al
ORDER OF TRANSFER, INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER to CA/Eastern District, Sacramento Division signed by Judge Dennis L. Beck on 06/29/2007. New case number 2:07-cv-01292 FCD-GGH (HC). (Esteves, C)
(HC) Maes v. Chrones et al
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1 vs. LEA ANN CHRONES, et al., Respondent. / Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The petitioner is challenging a conviction from Sacramento County, which is part of the Sacramento Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. Therefore, the petition should have been filed in the Sacramento Division. Pursuant to Local Rule 3-120(b), a civil action which has not been commenced in the ORDER OF TRANSFER MANUEL JOSE MAES, JR., Petitioner, 1:07-cv-00901-OWW-DLB (HC) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
proper court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Sacramento Division. This court will not rule on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis. 2. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Sacramento; and 3. All future filings shall reference the new Sacramento case number assigned and shall be filed at: United States District Court Eastern District of California 501 "I" Street, Suite 4-200 Sacramento, CA 95814 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ah0l4d
June 29, 2007
/s/ Dennis L. Beck UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?