Masterson v. Huerta-Garcia

Filing 89

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 3/28/2011 denying as MOOT 65 Motion for Scheduling Order and 67 Motion for Extension. (Waggoner, D)

Download PDF
(PC) Masterson v. Huerta-Garcia Doc. 89 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ________________________________________ PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion to Request Issuance of Scheduling Order and Ruling (Dkt. #65) and Plaintiff's Request for an Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Request for Extension of Time and the Court's Granting Extension of Time to Defendants (Dkt. #67). The court has reviewed the Motions. A review of the docket in this case reflects that the court entered a Scheduling Order (Dkt. #66) on October 8, 2010. With regard to Plaintiff's Request for an Extension of Time (Dkt. #67), Plaintiff notes that the court entered an Order (Dkt. #62) allowing Defendants an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion to Compel (Dkt. #45). Plaintiff asserts he never received Defendants' request for an extension of time, and he wanted to oppose it. The docket reflects that the court entered an Order (Dkt. #64) granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's Motion to Compel on September 30, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. 2. Plaintiff' Motion for Scheduling Order (Dkt. #65) is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension (Dkt. #67) is DENIED AS MOOT. DANIEL J. MASTERSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SILVIA HUERTA-GARCIA, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:07-cv-01307-KJD-PAL ORDER (Mtn for Scheduling Order - Dkt. #65) (Mtn to Extend Time - Dkt. #67) Dated this 28th day of March, 2011. Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?