Roark v. Marshall et al

Filing 63

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 7/22/10 ORDERING that documents filed by prisoner since the closing date of this action will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future fillings.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

(HC) Roark v. Marshall et al

Doc. 63

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
DAD:sj roar1338.158

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBERT L. ROARK, Petitioner, vs. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, et al., Respondents. / On July 15, 2010, petitioner filed a motion for extension of time and appointment of counsel (Doc. No. 62). On May 10, 2010, the assigned district judge issued an order adopting the findings and recommendations recommending that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Judgment was entered in this action on that same date and this case was closed. Accordingly, documents filed by petitioner since the closing date of this action will be disregarded and no orders will issue in response to future filings. DATED: July 22, 2010. ORDER No. CIV S-07-1338 LKK DAD P

Dockets.Justia.com