Barnes v. Denny et al
Filing
56
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER regarding confidential information signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 03/30/09. (See order for further details)(Plummer, M)
1
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Terence J. Cassidy, SBN 99180 John R. Whitefleet, SBN 213301 Glen A. Williams, SBN 257665 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706
Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SUTTER, SHERIFF JIM DENNEY (inadvertently s u e d as DENNY), OFFICER WILLY MITCHELL, OFFICER J. RUONA and SUTTER C O U N T Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 R Y A N A. BARNES, 13 P l a in tif f , 14 vs. 15 16 17 18 19 P lain tiff RYAN A. BARNES and Defendants COUNTY OF SUTTER, SHERIFF JIM 20 D E N N E Y (inadvertently sued as DENNY), OFFICER WILLY MITCHELL, OFFICER J. 21 R U O N A and SUTTER COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, by and through their 22 u n d e rs ig n e d counsel, and subject to the approval of the court, stipulate to the following 23 P ro te c tiv e Order, as set forth below: 24 1. 25 in ju rie s allegedly sustained to Plaintiff while being held as a pre-trial detainee at the Sutter 26 C o u n ty Jail. 27 /// 28
PORTER * SCOTT
ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6
C as e No. CIV 07-1380 GGH P S T IP U L A T E D PROTECTIVE ORDER
C O U N T Y OF SUTTER, SHERIFF JIM D E N N Y , OFFICER WILLY MITCHELL, O F F IC E R J. ROUNA and SUTTER C O U N T Y BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, D e f e n d a n ts . /
T h is is an action pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, arising from the
/// 1
00665169.WPD
w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PORTER * SCOTT
ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6
2.
P la in tif f has propounded Requests for Production of Documents, whereby
P lain tiff seeks information and documents, including sensitive and private personnel file in f o rm a tio n involving the parties, including the Sheriff Jim Denney, and Correctional O f f ic e rs Willy Mitchell and J. J. Ruona, which are confidential. Additionally, Plaintiffs seek in fo rm atio n and documents, including sensitive and private jail records information involving n o n -p a rty inmates alleged to be involved in the incident. 3. C o n f id e n tia l information is information which has not been made public and
is privileged and confidential and protected from public disclosure under applicable law. M a te r i a l designated as "confidential" under this order include the information contained th e re in , and any summaries, copies, abstracts, or documents derived in whole or in part from m ate rials designated as confidential (herein after "confidential material"). 4. C o n f id e n tia l material will be produced in conjunction with further responses
to Requests for Production of Documents, clearly marked as Confidential, and redacted as n e c e s s a r y to protect the rights and privacy of third-parties. 5. C o n f id e n tia l material produced pursuant to this order shall be used only for the
p u rp o s e of the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action and for no other purpose, co n fid en tial material may be disclosed or made available only to the court, to court reporters re ta in e d in this action, to counsel for a party (including the paralegal, clerical, and secretarial s ta f f employed by such counsel), and to the "qualified persons" designated below: a. Experts or consultants (together with their clerical staff) retained by
s u c h counsel to assist in the prosecution, defense or settlement of this action; b. c. A witness at any deposition or proceedings in this action; and Any other person as to whom the parties inviting agree in writing.
P r io r to receiving any confidential material, each "qualified person" shall be provided w ith a copy of this Order and shall execute a non-disclosure agreement in the form of A ttac h m e n t A, the original copy of which shall be maintained by the counsel who is p r o v i d in g these materials. /// 2
00665169.WPD
w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PORTER * SCOTT
ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6
6.
A n y party that files or intends to file with the Court, for purposes of
a d ju d ic a tio n or to use at trial, documents or materials, including the existence of such m a te ria l in any pleading, motion, exhibit or other paper, designated as Confidential pursuant to this Stipulated Protective Order, should, prior to filing such Confidential documents or m a te r ia ls , move the Court for an order sealing such documents upon a showing of good cause in compliance with the requirements of California Eastern District Court Local Rules 39-140 a n d 39-141, which are heretofore fully incorporated by reference. 7. U p o n the issuance of an order of the Court sealing such documents, all
d o c u m e n ts or materials designated as Confidential pursuant to this Stipulated Protective O rd e r, and all papers or documents containing information or materials designated as " C o n f id e n tia l" that are filed with the Court for any purpose shall be filed and served under s e a l, with the following statement affixed to the document or information: " T h is envelope is sealed pursuant to the order of the Court and contains Confidential in f o rm a tio n filed in this case by [name of party] and is not to be opened nor the contents th e re o f displayed or revealed except by order of the Court." 8. T h e portion of any deposition in which confidential materials are discussed
shall be taken only in the presence of qualified persons, as defined above. 9. N o th in g herein shall impose any restrictions on the use or disclosure by a
party of material obtained by such party independent of discovery in this action, whether or n o t such material is also obtained through discovery in this action, or from disclosing its own c o n f id e n tia l material as it deems appropriate. Receipt by any party of any confidential in f o rm a tio n shall not be either an admission or claim that the information is private, c o n f id e n tia l, proprietary, and/or trade secret, as asserted by the propounding party, nor an a d m i s s io n with respect to the authenticity, competency, relevance or materiality thereof. 10. A ll documents designated as "Confidential" shall be treated as such and shall
b e subject to the provisions hereof unless and until one of the following occurs: a. T h e party who claims that the material is Confidential Information
w ith d ra w s such designation in writing; or 3
00665169.WPD
w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
b.
T h e Court rules the material is not Confidential Information. If a party
c o n te n d s that any material is not entitled to confidential treatment, such party may at any time a p p ly to the Court for an order removing the confidential designation from any material. 11. This Order shall be without prejudice to present a motion to the court under
F e d e r a l Rule of Civil Procedure 26 (c) for a separate Protective Order as to any particular d o c u m ent or information, including restrictions different from those as specified herein. This s h a ll not be deemed to prejudice the parties in any way in any future application for m o d ifica tio n of this Stipulation and Order. 12. N o th in g in this Order nor the production of any information or document under
th e terms of this Order nor any proceedings pursuant to this Order, shall be deemed to have th e affect of an admission or waiver of objections or privileges by either party or of altering th e confidentiality or non-confidentiality of any such document or information or altering any e x is tin g right or obligation of any party or the absence thereof. 13. A t the conclusion of this litigation, counsel for Plaintiff shall return all
c o n f id e n tia l and derivative materials within 60 calendar days, or shall certify to the D e f en d a n ts that all such materials have been destroyed. 14. T h is Order shall survive the final termination of this action, and the court shall
re ta in jurisdiction to resolve any dispute concerning the use of information disclosed h e re u n d e r.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
D a te d : March 30, 2009 By
L A T H A M & WATKINS, LLP /s/ Brendan A. McShane Brendan A. McShane A tto rn e y for Plaintiff RYAN A. BARNES
25 26 27 28
PORTER * SCOTT
ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6
4
00665169.WPD
w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
1 D a te d : March 30, 2009 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ORDER 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PORTER * SCOTT
ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6
P O R T E R SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
By
/s/ John R. Whitefleet Terence J. Cassidy John R. Whitefleet G le n A. Williams A tto rn e y for Defendant C O U N T Y OF SUTTER, SHERIFF JIM D E N N E Y (inadvertently sued as D E N N Y ), OFFICER WILLY M IT C H E L L , OFFICER J. RUONA and S U T T E R COUNTY BOARD OF S U P E R V IS O R S
H a v in g reviewed the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED D a te d : April 1, 2009 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows ______________________________ J u d g e of the United States District Court E a ste rn District of California b a r n 1 3 8 0 .p r o
5
00665169.WPD
w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?