Hudson v. Smith et al

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING 8 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 2/1/08. Action is dismissed. CASE CLOSED(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Hudson v. Smith et al Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. OFFICER MICHAEL SMITH, Defendant. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262. On November 16, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Although the court received a letter from plaintiff on October 19, 2008, before the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations were filed, plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff's letter does not alter this court's decision. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA HOWARD MAURICE HUDSON, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-1384 WBS KJM P ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ORDERED that: ///// 1. The findings and recommendations filed November 16, 2007, are adopted in full; and 2. The action is dismissed. DATED: February 1, 2008 /huds1384.800 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?