County of Sacramento v. Turbomeca, S.A. et al

Filing 7

RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 7/27/07 relating this action to 06-cv-1563 WBS DAD. This action is reassigned to Judge William B Shubb and Magistrate Dale A Drozd. All hearings in this case are VACATED. Clerk to make appropriate adjustments. The caption on this case shall be shown as Civ. S-07-01398 WBS DAD. (Cayo, A)

Download PDF
County of Sacramento v. Turbomeca, S.A. et al Doc. 7 Case 2:07-cv-01398-WBS-DAD Document 7 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 I N T H E U N I T E D STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ERIC HENRIKSON, an individual; IRIS KIEVERNAGEL, individually and as administrator of the estate of JOSEPH KIEVERNAGEL; PATSY KIEVERNAGEL; JOSEPH KIEVERNAGEL; KATHLEEN HAMILTON and THOMAS BLOUNT, individually and as successors in interest to the estate of KEVIN BLOUNT, Plaintiffs, v. TURBOMECA, S.A., a French Corporation, LA SOCIETE ANONYME TURBOMECA FRANCE, a French Corporation, TURBOMECA USA, a Texas Corporation, TURBOMECA ENGINE CORPORATION, a Texas corporation, Defendants. / COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, Lien Claimant. / CIV. NO. S-07-01398 LKK KJM CIV. NO. S-06-01563 WBS DAD 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 RELATED CASE ORDER Examination of the above-entitled actions 27 reveals that they are related within the meaning of Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:07-cv-01398-WBS-DAD Document 7 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Local Rule 123(a)(E.D. Cal. 1984). The plaintiffs in both cases seek damages from the same defendants arising out of the same incident. Accordingly, the assignment of the matters to the same judge is likely to effect a substantial saving of judicial effort and is also likely to be convenient for the parties. The parties should be aware that relating the cases under Local Rule 123 merely has the result that both actions are assigned to the same judge; no 10 consolidation of the actions is effected. 11 12 Under the regular practice of this court, related cases are generally assigned to the judge and magistrate to whom 13 the first filed action was assigned. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the action denominated County of Sacramento v. Turbomeca, S.A., et al., No. Civ. S-07-01398 LKK KJM be, and the same hereby is, reassigned to Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Dale A. Drozd for all further proceedings, and any dates currently set in this reassigned case only are hereby VACATED. Henceforth, the caption on documents filed in the reassigned case shall be shown as County of Sacramento v. Turbomeca, S.A., et al., No. Civ. S-07-01398 WBS DAD IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court make appropriate adjustment in the assignment of // Case 2:07-cv-01398-WBS-DAD Document 7 Filed 07/30/2007 Page 3 of 3 civil cases to compensate for this reassignment. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: July 27, 2007

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?