County of Sacramento v. Turbomeca, S.A. et al

Filing 75

STIPULATION and ORDER 74 signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 2/22/12; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) All depositions of all witnesses taken in the matter Eric Henrikson et al v. Turbomeca S.A. et al, Case Number No. 2:06-cv-01563-WBS-DAD, will be treated as though they were taken in this case, Case No. 2:07-CV-01398-WBS-KJN. (2) All parties have not waived any objections to admissibility of any portion of the above referenced depositions under the Federal Rules of Evidence.(Matson, R)

1
2
3
4
5

CHARLETON S. PEARSE, SBN 122491
ADAM M. AMBROZY, SBN 258237
BENJAMIN D. ORAM, SBN 269453
LENAHAN, LEE, SLATER & PEARSE, LLP
1030 15TH Street, Suite 300
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

Case No. 2:07-CV-01398-WBS-KJN

10
Plaintiff,
11
v.
12
13
14
15

TURBOMECA, S.A., a French
Corporation; LA SOCIÉTÉ ANONYME
TURBOMECA FRANCÉ, a French
Corporation, TURBOMECA USA, a
Texas Corporation, TURBOMECA
ENGINE CORPORATION, a Texas
Corporation,

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER REGARDING THE USE OF
DEPOSITIONS FROM A RELATED
MATTER

16
17

Defendants.

18
Plaintiff COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”), and
19
20

Defendants, TURBOMECA, S.A. and TURBOMECA USA (hereinafter collectively referred to

21

as “Defendants”) hereby stipulate and seek an order of the Court that all depositions of all

22

witnesses taken in the matter Eric Henrikson et al v. Turbomeca S.A. et al, Case Number No.

23

2:06-cv-01563-WBS-DAD, will be treated as though they were taken in this case, Case No. 2:07-

24

CV-01398-WBS-KJN.

25

Despite this stipulation, no party waives any objections to admissibility of any portion of

26
the above referenced depositions under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
27
28
-1STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER.

This Stipulation and Order may be executed in counter-part, and faxed and/or authorized
1
2
3

electronic signature shall be deemed the same as an original execution.
DATED: February 3, 2012

LENAHAN, LEE, SLATER & PEARSE, LLP

4
5
By:

6
7
8
9
10

DATED: February 3, 2012

/s/ Charleton S. Pearse
_______________
CHARLETON S. PEARSE
ADAM M. AMBROZY
BENJAMIN D. ORAM
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
PERKINS COIE, LLP

11
12
13
14

By:

/s/ Brendan Murphy_________________________
BRENDAN MURPHY
Attorneys for Defendant,
TURBOMECA, S.A. and TURBOMECA USA

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER.

1

ORDER

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
(1) All depositions of all witnesses taken in the matter Eric Henrikson et al v. Turbomeca
S.A. et al, Case Number No. 2:06-cv-01563-WBS-DAD, will be treated as though they
were taken in this case, Case No. 2:07-CV-01398-WBS-KJN.
(2) All parties have not waived any objections to admissibility of any portion of the above
referenced depositions under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
Dated: February 22, 2012

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER.