County of Sacramento v. Turbomeca, S.A. et al

Filing 81

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 4/18/2012 ORDERING that the 5/3/2012 hearing on the Turbomeca Defendants' 78 motion to compel is VACATED. The Turbomeca Defendants may re-notice their motion to compel if necessary. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,

11
12
13

Plaintiff,

No. 2:07-cv-01398 WBS KJN

v.
TURBOMECA S.A., a French
corporation, et al.,

14
Defendants.
15

ORDER
/

16

An unopposed motion to compel the production of certain radar data (Dkt.

17

No. 73) filed by defendants Turbomeca S.A. and Turbomeca USA, Inc. (“Turbomeca

18

Defendants”) is set to be heard by the undersigned on May 3, 2012.1 However, on April 13,

19

2012, the Turbomeca Defendants filed a Notice of Settlement (Dkt. No. 80), which provides

20

“that all parties have agreed to settle this matter,” subject to approval by the County of

21

Sacramento’s Board of Supervisors.

22

In light of the Notice of Settlement, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

23

1.

24

compel (Dkt. No. 73) is vacated.

The May 3, 2012 hearing on the Turbomeca Defendants’ motion to

25
1

26

This case was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Eastern District of California Local
Rule 302(c)(1) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).
1

1
2
3
4

2.

The Turbomeca Defendants may re-notice their motion to compel if

necessary.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 18, 2012

5
6
7

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2