Matthews v. California Department of Corrections et al

Filing 102

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/27/12 DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE 83 , 85 , 86 , 90 , 91 , and 92 . (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SCOTT CHARLES MATTHEWS,

11

Plaintiff,

Defendant.

12
13
14

No. 2: 07-cv-1418 GEB CKD P

ORDER

vs.
HUI,

15
16

/
Plaintiff is proceeding pro se with a prisoner civil rights complaint under 42

17

U.S.C. § 1983. The court has been made aware that the matter was settled by Magistrate Judge

18

Kellison on May 2, 2012. (See Dkt. No. 100.) In light of the settlement between the parties, the

19

pending outstanding motions will be denied without prejudice.

20

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

21

1.

22
23

DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;
2.

24
25
26

Plaintiff’s motions for the issuance of subpoenas (Dkt. Nos. 83 & 85.) are

Plaintiff’s motion to appoint counsel (Dkt. No. 86.) is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

3.

Plaintiff’s motions to compel (Dkt. Nos. 90 & 91.) are DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
1

1

4.

2

Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time to review the state’s pretrial
statement (Dkt. No. 92) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

3

Dated: August 27, 2012

4

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9

7
matt1418.misc

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2