Holliday v. Sisto et al

Filing 36

ORDER ADOPTING 31 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 09/17/09 and ORDERING that dft Naku's 22 Motion for Summary judgment is GRANTED; dft Naku is TERMINATED as a party to this action; and this case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings as to plfs claim against dft Traquina. (Benson, A.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. B. NAKU, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On June 26, 2009, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. /// /// /// 1 CURTIS HOLLIDAY, Plaintiff, ORDER No. CIV S-07-1422-LKK-CMK-P IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 full; In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed June 26, 2009, are adopted in 2. 3. 4. Defendant Naku's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 22) is granted; Defendant Naku is terminated as a party to this action; and The case is referred back to the Magistrate Judge for further proceedings as to plaintiff's claim against defendant Traquina. DATED: September 17, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?