Holliday v. Sisto et al

Filing 42

ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/03/09 ordering that any hearing dates currently set before the undersigned are vacated. It is further ordered that the clerk of the court reassign this case to the Honorable Craig M. Kellison. All future documents filed in the above-captioned case shall reference the following case number: CIV S-07-1422 CMK. (cc: LKK)(Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 D.K. SISTO, et al., 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Defendants. / Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See ORDER CURTIS HOLLIDAY, NO. CIV. S-07-1422 LKK/CMK According to Local Rule 72-305, both the district court judge assigned to the case and the magistrate judge must approve the reference to the magistrate judge. The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and recommends that the above-captioned case be reassigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. //// 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS ORDERED that any hearing dates currently set before the undersigned are VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Craig M. Kellison. All future documents filed in the above-captioned case shall reference the following case number: DATED: No. Civ. S-07-1422 CMK. November 3, 2009 /s/Lawrence K. Karlton LAWRENCE K. KARLTON SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Having also reviewed the file, I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. DATED: November 3, 2009 _________________________________ _____ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?