Ontiveros v. Subia
Filing
67
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 1/29/15 ordering ( Evidentiary Hearing set for 6/1/2015 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DAD) before Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd.) The evidentiary hearing will be limited to the issue of whether petiti oner is entitled to equitable tolling of the statute of limitations. The court will issue a separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for petitioner's attendance at the evidentiary hearing approximately 6 weeks prior to the hearing date. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ED ONTIVEROS,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:07-cv-1441 JAM DAD P
v.
ORDER
R.J. SUBIA, Warden,
15
Respondent.
16
17
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for writ of habeas
18
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court finds that an evidentiary hearing is warranted in
19
this matter on the issue of whether petitioner is entitled to equitable tolling of the statute of
20
limitations.
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
22
1. This matter is set for an evidentiary hearing before the undersigned on June 1, 2015, at
23
9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 27;
2. The evidentiary hearing shall be limited to the issue of whether petitioner is entitled to
24
25
equitable tolling of the statute of limitations; and
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
3. The court will issue a separate order and writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum for
2
petitioner’s attendance at the evidentiary hearing approximately six weeks prior to the hearing
3
date. Counsel for petitioner is directed to keep the court apprised of petitioner’s institution of
4
incarceration.
5
Dated: January 29, 2015
6
7
8
DAD:9
onti1441.hrg
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?