Lehr, et al. v. City of Sacramento, et al.

Filing 42

STIPULATION and ORDER 41 signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/14/2009. The last day to hear Dispositive Motions is 6/11/2009. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 A N T H O N Y LEHR, et al., 13 P l a i n t if f s , 14 vs. 15 C IT Y OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 16 D e f e n d a n ts . 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PORTER * SCOTT ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S IT Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6 A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION Terence J. Cassidy, SBN 99180 Michael W. Pott, SBN 186156 Patricia L. Spiegel, SBN 256244 350 University Ave., Suite 200 Sacramento, California 95825 TEL: 916.929.1481 FAX: 916.927.3706 Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SHERIFF JOHN M C G IN N E S S , ANDERSON, MCELHENY and BENNETT U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA C as e No. 07-1565 MCE GGH S T I P U L A T I O N AND REQUEST T O CONTINUE HEARING FOR D I S P O S I T I V E MOTIONS; ORDER C O M P L A I N T FILED: Aug. 2, 2007 T R I A L DATE: Jan. 11, 2010 / IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and AGREED, by and between the parties hereto, that th e last day for all dispositive motions to be heard (except for continuances, TROs, or other e m e r g e n c y applications) be continued from June 10, 2009, to June 11, 2009. G o o d cause exists to continue the last day for hearing dispositive motions by one day, b e c a u se based on the Court's available hearing dates, the last day the Court would be able to hear a dispositive motion is May 21, 2009. This would require the COUNTY Defendants to file a motion for summary judgment no later than April 20, 2009. The COUNTY D e f en d a n ts and Plaintiffs have been discussing possible settlement of the case, but the C o u n ty's Board of Supervisors cannot consider the proposed settlement until April 21, 2009, w h ich is one day after the County Defendants would have to file their motion for summary 1 STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; [PROPOSED] ORDER 00671244.WPD w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ju d g m e n t. To avoid the expense of preparing a motion for summary judgment prior to the B o ard 's consideration of the settlement proposal and the use of Court resources to review s u c h papers, the parties agree to continue the last day to hear dispositive motions by one day to June 11, 2009 - which will change the due date for the dispositive motions to May 11, 2 0 0 9 ­ three weeks after the County Defendant is able to consider the settlement proposal. I T IS SO STIPULATED. R e sp e c tf u lly submitted, D A T E D : April 13, 2009 L A W OFFICES OF MARK E. MERIN By /s/ Mark E. Merin Mark E. Merin A tto r n e y for Plaintiffs, A N T H O N Y LEHR, et al. 10 11 12 D A T E D : April 13, 2009 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 By 23 24 25 26 27 28 PORTER * SCOTT ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S IT Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6 E IL E E N M. TEICHERT C ity Attorney By /s/ Chance L. Trimm Chance L. Trimm S e n io r Deputy City Attorney A tto r n e y for Defendants, C IT Y OF SACRAMENTO, POLICE C H IE F ALBERT NAJERA, MICHAEL C O O P E R , and MARK ZOULAS D A T E D : April 13, 2009 P O R T E R SCOTT A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION /s/ Patricia L. Spiegel Terence J. Cassidy M ich a e l W. Pott P a tricia L. Spiegel Attorneys for Defendants, C O U N T Y OF SACRAMENTO, SHERIFF J O H N MCGINNESS, ANDERSON, M C E L H E N Y AND BENNETT 2 STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; [PROPOSED] ORDER 00671244.WPD w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m 1 2 3 C a se Name: L e h r , et al. v. City of Sacramento, et al. C a s e No.: U S D C EDCA No.: 0 7 -1 5 6 5 MCE GGH G o o d cause appearing, the Court grants the stipulation to continue the last day to hear 4 d is p o s itiv e motions from June 10, 2009 to June 11, 2009. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PORTER * SCOTT ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S IT Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. D a te d : April 14, 2009 ________________________________ M O R R IS O N C. ENGLAND, JR. U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3 00671244.WPD w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PORTER * SCOTT ATTORNEYS 3 5 0 U N I V E R S IT Y A V E ., S U I T E 2 0 0 SACRAM EN TO , CA 95825 T E L : 9 1 6 . 9 2 9 .1 4 8 1 F A X : 9 1 6 . 9 2 7 .3 7 0 6 4 00671244.WPD w w w .p o r t er s c o t t .c o m STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING FOR DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS; [PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?