Miller v. Woodford et al
Filing
233
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 7/11/12, ORDERING that defendants James, Dial and Cox are DISMISSED from this action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear their own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees in this action. (Kastilahn, A) Modified on 7/11/2012 (Kastilahn, A).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672
Attorney General of California
PETER A. MESHOT, State Bar No. 117061
Supervising Deputy Attorney General
JILL SCALLY, State Bar No. 161513
Deputy Attorney General
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Telephone: (916) 324-1042
Fax: (916) 322-8288
E-mail: Jill.Scally@doj.ca.gov
Attorneys for Attorneys for J. Huckabee , G. James,
M.D., L. Dial, M.D., and G. Castro
8
9
10
11
12
WILLIAMS & ASSOCIATE
Kathleen J. Williams, CSB #127021
Lakeysia R. Beene, CSB #265078
1250 Sutterville Road, Suite 290
Sacramento, CA 95822
Telephone: (916) 456-1122
Fax: (916) 737-1126
Attorneys for defendant Roger Cox, M.D.
13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
GERALD LEE MILLER, JR.,
18
19
v.
2:07-cv-01646 LKK EFB (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF
DEFENDANTS JAMES, DIAL AND COX
WITH PREJUDICE
20
21
22
JANE WOODFORD, WARDEN FELKER,
ET AL.,
Defendants.
23
24
25
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, pursuant to the Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice of
26
Defendants James, Dial and Cox pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the
27
above-captioned action is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
28
1
Order for Dismissal of Defendants James, Dial and Cox with Prejudice (2:07-cv-01646 LKK EFB (PC))
1
Each party shall bear their own costs, expenses and attorneys’ fees and in this action.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
3
Dated: July 11, 2012.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Order for Dismissal of Defendants James, Dial and Cox with Prejudice (2:07-cv-01646 LKK EFB (PC))
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?