Miller v. Woodford et al
Filing
240
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/22/2023 ORDERING the court takes no action plaintiff's 238 filing as this case is now closed. The court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
GERALD LEE MILLER, JR.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:07-cv-01646-LKK-EFB (PC)
v.
ORDER
JANE WOODFORD, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
This prisoner civil rights action has been closed since October 4, 2012. Nevertheless, on
17
18
September 13, 2023, plaintiff filed a letter directed to the undersigned magistrate judge. ECF No.
19
238. In the letter, plaintiff alleges that he is being denied medical treatment in retaliation for this
20
court’s findings and recommendations in this action. Id. He asks the court for an order
21
compelling his medical treatment. Id. The court takes no action on this filing as this case is now
22
closed.
23
If plaintiff wishes to involve the court in any claim(s) that his First and/or Eighth
24
Amendment rights are being violated by a retaliatory denial of medical care, he must file a new
25
lawsuit asserting those claims.
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
2
3
The court will not respond to future filings in this action that are not authorized by the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
So ordered.
4
5
Dated: September 22, 2023
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?