Barnes et al vs. County of Placer, et al.,

Filing 83

ORDER granting Motion to correct record 82 signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/5/10. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ROBERT R. POWELL, ESQ. [SBN: 159747] LAW OFFICES OF ROBERT R. POWELL 925 West Hedding Street San Josť, California 95126 T: 408-553-0200 F: 408-553-0203 ANDREA M. MILLER, ESQ. [SBN: 88992] NAGELEY, MEREDITH & MILLER, INC. 8001 Folsom Boulevard, Suite 100 Sacramento, CA 95826 T: (916) 386-8282 F: (916) 386-8952 Attorneys for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Sacramento Division) BRIGIT BARNES, et al. Plaintiffs, v. COUNTY OF PLACER, et al., Defendants. // // // // // // // // 1 ) Case No. 2:07 CV 01678 JAM-JFM ) ) ORDER GRANTING ) MOTION TO CORRECT RECORD ) F.R.A.P. (10)(e)(2)(b) ) ) ) ) ) Order Granting Motion to Correct Record Barnes v. Placer County PDF created with No. 2:07 CV trial version www.pdffactory.com (Case pdfFactory 01678 JAM-JFM) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 The Court having read and considered Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion to Correct Record, the Declaration of counsel submitted in support thereof, and any opposition or nonopposit ion filed by any Defendant(s), and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, the record is corrected to include the following documents: ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑ M. X. Deposition, pages 50, 53 & 71; J. Barnes Deposition, pages 112, 240-255; B. Barnes Deposition, page 9; E. Hill Deposition, Vol. I - pages 43, 44// Vol. II - page 150; R. X. Deposition, Pages 1,2,3, 26 & 29. /s/ John A. Mendez_____________ United States District Court Judge Eastern District of California Dated: January 5, 2010 2 Order Granting Motion to Correct Record Barnes v. Placer County PDF created with No. 2:07 CV trial version www.pdffactory.com (Case pdfFactory 01678 JAM-JFM)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?