Securities and Exchange Commission v. Secure Investement Services, Inc., et al

Filing 896

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/17/2011 GRANTING receiver's 890 Motion for Ninth Interim Application to allow and pay fees, expenses, and attorney's fees for Quilling Seland Lownds Winslett & Moser. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 2 3 4 SACRAMENTO DIVISION SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 5 Case No. 2:07-cv-01724 GEB CMK Plaintiff, 6 v. 7 SECURE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC., AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., LYNDON GROUP, INC., DONALD F. NEUHAUS, and KIMBERLY A. SNOWDEN, 8 9 10 ORDER ON RECEIVER’S NINTH INTERIM APPLICATION TO ALLOW AND PAY (1) RECEIVER’S FEES AND EXPENSES AND (2) ATTORNEY’S FEES Defendants. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 On this day the Court considered the Receiver’s Ninth Interim Application to allow and pay fees of the Receiver, and to allow the Receiver’s attorneys Quilling Selander Lownds Winslett & Moser to be paid and their expenses reimbursed. The Court, having considered the motion, the attached exhibits, and all pleadings on file is of the opinion that the motion should be GRATNED. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the fees of the Receiver and the Receiver’s attorneys, Quilling Selander Lownds Winslett & Moser, be paid 19 their expenses reimbursed, as set forth in Receiver’s Ninth Interim Application to Allow and Pay 20 (1) Receiver’s Fees and Expenses and (2) Attorney’s Fees and Expenses. 21 22 23 24 Dated: August 17, 2011 GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 -1- [Proposed] Order on Receiver’s Ninth Interim Application to Allow and Pay (1) Receiver’s Fees and Expenses and (2) Attorney’s Fees and Expenses C:\Documents and Settings\mkelly\My Documents\Quilling\August 22, 2011 hearings\Proposed_Order_On_Receiver’s_Ninth_Interim_Application_To_Allow_And_Pay_(1)_Receiver’s_Fees_And_Expenses_And_( 2)_Attorney’s_Fees.DOC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?