Securities and Exchange Commission v. Secure Investement Services, Inc., et al
Filing
896
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 8/17/2011 GRANTING receiver's 890 Motion for Ninth Interim Application to allow and pay fees, expenses, and attorney's fees for Quilling Seland Lownds Winslett & Moser. (Marciel, M)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
4
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
5
Case No. 2:07-cv-01724 GEB CMK
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
SECURE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.,
AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,
LYNDON GROUP, INC., DONALD F.
NEUHAUS, and KIMBERLY A. SNOWDEN,
8
9
10
ORDER ON RECEIVER’S NINTH
INTERIM APPLICATION TO ALLOW
AND PAY (1) RECEIVER’S FEES
AND EXPENSES AND (2)
ATTORNEY’S FEES
Defendants.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
On this day the Court considered the Receiver’s Ninth Interim Application to allow and
pay fees of the Receiver, and to allow the Receiver’s attorneys Quilling Selander Lownds
Winslett & Moser to be paid and their expenses reimbursed. The Court, having considered the
motion, the attached exhibits, and all pleadings on file is of the opinion that the motion should be
GRATNED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the fees of the
Receiver and the Receiver’s attorneys, Quilling Selander Lownds Winslett & Moser, be paid
19
their expenses reimbursed, as set forth in Receiver’s Ninth Interim Application to Allow and Pay
20
(1) Receiver’s Fees and Expenses and (2) Attorney’s Fees and Expenses.
21
22
23
24
Dated: August 17, 2011
GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
-1-
[Proposed] Order on Receiver’s Ninth Interim Application to Allow and Pay (1) Receiver’s Fees
and Expenses and (2) Attorney’s Fees and Expenses
C:\Documents and Settings\mkelly\My Documents\Quilling\August 22, 2011
hearings\Proposed_Order_On_Receiver’s_Ninth_Interim_Application_To_Allow_And_Pay_(1)_Receiver’s_Fees_And_Expenses_And_(
2)_Attorney’s_Fees.DOC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?