Securities and Exchange Commission v. Secure Investement Services, Inc., et al

Filing 936

STIPULATION and ORDER AUTHORIZING RECEIVER TO INCREASE BANK FINANCING FACILITY signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. on 3/1/2013 ORDERING the Receiver to increase the bank financing facility to $4.5 million in order to meet upcoming premium obligations. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 BOUTIN JONES INC. Chris Gibson, SBN 073353 Maralee Eriksen, SBN 208699 555 Capitol Mall, Suite 1500 Sacramento, California 95814-4603 Tel. (916) 321-4444 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS, WINSLETT & MOSER, P.C. Michael J. Quilling (Tex. Bar No. 16432300) – Admitted Pro Hac Vice Brent J. Rodine (Tex. Bar No. 24048770) – Admitted Pro Hac Vice 2001 Bryan Street, Suite 1800 Dallas, Texas 75201 Telephone: (214) 871-2100 Facsimile: (214) 871-2111 Attorneys for Michael J. Quilling Receiver of Defendants Secure Investment Services, Inc., American Financial Services, Inc., and Lyndon Group, Inc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO DIVISION 13 14 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, 15 Case No. 2:07-cv-01724 GEB CMK Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER AUTHORIZING RECEIVER TO INCREASE BANK FINANCING FACILITY 16 17 18 19 v. SECURE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC., AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC., LYNDON GROUP, INC., DONALD F. NEUHAUS, and KIMBERLY A. SNOWDEN, 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 THE HONORABLE GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE: 24 Michael J. Quilling, the Receiver appointed in these proceedings (“Receiver”), files this 25 Stipulation and Order Authorizing Receiver to Increase Bank Financing Facility and in support 26 TO: of such would show the following: 27 28 -1Receiver’s Motion to Compel Payment of Premium Share from «Investor» [«Viator»] 516100.1 1. 1 By order of October 30, 2007, the Court appointed Michael J. Quilling as 2 Receiver for Secure Investment Services, Inc. and other related entities (“SIS”) and authorized 3 him to take complete and exclusive control, possession, and custody of all receivership assets. 4 2. The receivership estate’s largest single asset is a portfolio currently comprised of 5 33 life insurance policies with a combined death benefit exceeding $30 million. Those policies 6 7 8 currently carry premium obligations of roughly $1.6 million a year. Failure to pay those premiums will cause some of the life insurance policies to lapse. 3. 9 Since the Receiver’s appointment, by Court Order four policies with face value 10 totaling $11,250,000.00 have been abandoned or sold because the cost of premiums did not make 11 it economically feasible to continue to maintain the policies. (See Dkt. Nos. 254, 767, and 817.) 12 In addition, 11 policies have matured with a total of $7,614,074.35 in death benefits paid to the 13 14 receivership estate. The Receiver has used those funds to pay down the amount borrowed that is 15 described below, and to continue to pay monthly premiums due on the current portfolio of life 16 insurance policies. 17 18 19 4. The Receiver intends to continue paying premiums on the 33 remaining life insurance policies since those policies and their death benefits are the most promising source of recovery to pay over 800 investors and creditors with claims in this case. 20 5. In order to pay premiums, the Receiver approached Sovereign Bank in Dallas, 21 22 Texas, to discuss establishing a $3 million line of credit secured by some of the receivership 23 estate’s insurance policies. The Receiver chose Sovereign Bank because it has experience in 24 making loans secured by a portfolio of insurance policies. After negotiation and as described 25 below, Sovereign Bank agreed to establish a $3 million line of credit, which was increased to $4 26 million in 2009. 27 28 -2Receiver’s Motion to Compel Payment of Premium Share from «Investor» [«Viator»] 516100.1 6. 1 On August 29, 2007, the Receiver filed a Stipulated Motion to Obtain Interim 2 Bank Financing (Dkt. No. 38). The Court entered its Order (Dkt. No. 57) authorizing the 3 Receiver to borrow $200,000 from Sovereign Bank. 4 7. On February 21, 2008, the Receiver filed an Unopposed Motion to Approve Bank 5 Financing (Dkt. No. 116), which proposed an increase in the available line of credit to $3 6 7 million. That increase was intended to ensure that premium obligations could be met through the 8 2008 calendar year. The Court entered its Order (Dkt. No. 131) authorizing that increase on 9 March 14, 2008. 10 8. 11 12 On February 20, 2009, the Receiver filed a Stipulation and Order to Increase Bank Financing Facility (Dkt. No. 469), which proposed an increase in the available line of credit to $4 million. That increase was intended to ensure that premium obligations could be met 13 14 15 through the 2009 calendar year. The Court entered its Order (Dkt. No. 470) authorizing that increase on February 26, 2009. 9. 16 The Receiver constantly monitors the health status of the viators named on the 17 current portfolio of insurance policies. The Receiver has been advised several insureds, with 18 death benefits in excess of $4 million, are in ill health. Therefore, the Receiver anticipates 19 policies to mature in the next several months. 20 10. To date, the Receiver has borrowed $3,767,204.00 against that $4 million line of 21 22 credit. Since the Receiver is close to exhausting his current line of credit, he recently negotiated 23 an increase in the financing facility to a total of $4.5 million. It is hoped that maturities from 24 policies will allow the Receiver to repay most, if not all, of the line of credit before it is 25 exhausted. 26 27 28 -3Receiver’s Motion to Compel Payment of Premium Share from «Investor» [«Viator»] 516100.1 11. 1 Clearly, it is in the best interest of the receivership estate and the investors to keep 2 the remaining life insurance policies in force. An increase in the bank financing facility will 3 ensure that enough funds are available to meet premium obligations for the immediate future. 4 WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, the parties stipulate to authorization of 5 Receiver to increase the bank financing facility to $4.5 million in order to meet upcoming 6 7 premium obligations. QUILLING, SELANDER, LOWNDS, WINSLETT & MOSER, P.C. 8 9 10 Dated: February 14, 2013 By: 11 12 13 /s/ Michael J. Quilling Michael J. Quilling Brent J. Rodine Attorneys for Receiver U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 14 15 16 Dated: February 18, 2013 By: 17 18 19 /s/ Thomas J. Eme (authorized on 2/18/13) Thomas J. Eme John S. Yun Attorneys for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission MUNSCH HARDT KOPF & HARR, P.C. 20 21 Dated: February 14, 2013 22 By: /s/ Steven A. Harr (authorized on 2/14/13) Steven A. Harr Dennis L. Roossien, Jr. Attorneys for Examiner 23 24 25 ORDER 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. _________________________ March 1, 2013 Senior United States District Judge GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR. -4Receiver’s Motion to Compel Payment of Premium Share from «Investor» [«Viator»] 516100.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?