Securities and Exchange Commission v. Secure Investement Services, Inc., et al
Filing
990
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., on 2/23/15 ORDERING that the Receiver's 981 Final Application to Allow and Pay Attorneys' Fees and Expenses of Local Counsel is GRANTED. The fees of Local Counsel, Boutin Jones Inc., are be paid and Boutin Jones Inc.'s expenses reimbursed as set forth in Receiver's Final Application to Allow and Pay Attorneys' Fees and Expenses of Local Counsel and Receiver is authorized to pay BOUTIN the amount of $1,000.00 to cover fees and expenses to complete the matters necessary to close the case. (Kastilahn, A)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
SECURE INVESTMENT SERVICES, INC.,
AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.,
LYNDON GROUP, INC., DONALD F. NEUHAUS,
and KIMBERLY A. SNOWDEN,
Case No. 2:07-cv-01724 GEB CMK
ORDER RE: RECEIVER’S FINAL
APPLICATION TO ALLOW AND
PAY ATTORNEY’S FEES AND
EXPENSES OF LOCAL COUNSEL
Defendants.
12
13
14
15
The Court considered the Receiver’s Final Application to Allow and Pay Attorneys’ Fees
and Expenses of Local Counsel, decided that the motion should be GRANTED.
16
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the fees of Local
17
Counsel, Boutin Jones Inc., be paid and Boutin Jones Inc.’s expenses reimbursed, as set forth in
18
Receiver’s Final Application to Allow and Pay Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses of Local Counsel
19
and Receiver is authorized to pay BOUTIN the amount of $1,000.00 to cover fees and expenses
20
to complete the matters necessary to close the case.
21
Dated: February 23, 2015
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1ORDER RE: RECEIVER’S FINAL APPLICATION TO
ALLOW AND PAY ATTORNEY’S FEES AND EXPENSES OF LOCAL COUNSEL
665821.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?