Continental Casualty Company v. St. Paul Surplus Lines Insurance Company
ORDER Vacating Pending Scheduling Order Dates signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 4/6/09. All pending scheduling order dates are hereby VACATED. A new pre-trial status scheduling order will be issued once Magistrate Judge Brennan rules on the pending discovery motions.(Kastilahn, A)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
WOOLLS & PEER
A Professional Corporation nd One Wilshire Boulevard, 22 Floor Los Angeles, California 90017
JOHN E. PEER - State Bar No. 95978 JEFFREY A. DOLLINGER - State Bar No. 146582 WOOLLS & PEER A Professional Corporation nd One Wilshire Boulevard, 22 Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 629-1600 Facsimile: (213) 629-1660 email@example.com firstname.lastname@example.org Attorneys for Plaintiff, CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY Case No.: 2:07-CV-01744-MCE-EFB Plaintiff, v. ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY; DOES 1 through 10, inclusive Defendants. Hon. Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. ORDER VACATING PENDING SCHEDULING ORDER DATES Removal Date: August 24, 2007 Trial Date: March 8, 2010 Discovery Cut-off: May 8, 2009 Motion Cut-off: September 8, 2009
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The parties having stipulated and requested continuances of the pending scheduling order dates, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. 2. All pending Scheduling Order dates are vacated. A new Pre-Trial Status Scheduling Order will be issued once Magistrate Judge
Edmund F. Brennan rules on the pending discovery motions.
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: April 6, 2009 __________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER 165824.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING AND BRIEFING DATES
PDF created with pdfFactory trial version www.pdffactory.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?