Dawe v. Corrections USA et al

Filing 532

ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/17/10 ORDERING the dfts to file a further response pltfs' application 520 five days following the Court's disposition of all post-trial motions. (Carlos, K)

Download PDF
Dawe v. Corrections USA, et al Doc. 532 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 + UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRIAN DAWE; FLAT IRON MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATES, LLC, formerly known as FLAT IRON MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATES, a Partnership, NO. CIV. S-07-1790 LKK/EFB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER CORRECTIONS USA, a California Corporation; CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS' ASSOCIATION, a California Corporation; JAMES BAIARDI, an individual; DONALD JOSEPH BAUMANN, an individual, Defendants. / AND CONSOLIDATED ACTIONS & RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS / On October 29, 2010, plaintiffs filed an application for determination of prevailing party status. (ECF No. 520). On 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 November 10, 2010, the Court ordered defendants to file a response to the application. (ECF No. 530). On November 16, 2010, defendants filed a response in which they requested that they have "five Court 1 Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 days to reevaluate and further respond to Plaintiffs' Application after the Court's disposition of Defendants' post-trial motions." (ECF No. 531). Later that day, plaintiffs' counsel informed the Court that he does not intend to respond to defendants' response and that he has "no problem with Defendants' closing request" to file a further response to plaintiffs' application after disposition of post-trial motions. For the foregoing reasons, the Court ORDERS that defendants SHALL file a further response to plaintiffs' application (ECF No. 520) five (5) days following the Court's disposition of all posttrial motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 17, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?