Watson v. Sisto, et al

Filing 85

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/27/09 ordering the parties agree to a 60 day extension of the remaining deadlines in this case, whereby the parties will have until 02/12/10 to file all pretrial motions (including dispositive pretrial motions) other than motions to compel and motions in limine.(Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff Nyles Lawayne Watson and Defendants Dennis K. Sisto, Jason Rohrer, M.D., Richard Tan, M.D., Alvaro C. Traquina, M.D., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and California State Prison ­ Solano file this Stipulation to Extend Deadlines as follows: // // // // // // // 1 vs. DENNIS K. SISTO, et al., Defendants. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NYLES LAWAYNE WATSON, Plaintiff, Case No. CIV S-07-1871 LKK GGH P STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES AND ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 1. The Parties agree to a 60-day extension of the remaining deadlines in this case, whereby the Parties will have until February 12, 2010 to file all pretrial motions (including dispositive pretrial motions) other than motions to compel and motions in limine. Dated: October 27, 2009 Respectfully submitted, JONES DAY By: /s/ Matthew J. Silveria Matthew J. Silveria Attorneys for Plaintiff NYLES LAWAYNE WATSON Dated: October 27, 2009 Respectfully submitted, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA By: /s/ Catherine Woodbridge Guess (as authorized on October 21, 2009) Catherine Woodbridge Guess Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants JASON ROHRER, M.D., RICHARD TAN, M.D., DENNIS K. SISTEO AND ALVARO C. TRAQUINA, M.D. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 27, 2009 wats1871.eotdd /s/ Gregory G. Hollows United States Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?