Watson v. Sisto, et al
Filing
94
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/22/10 vacating 92 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Amended findings and recommendations will be filed in due course.(Dillon, M)
<![CDATA[
(PC) Watson v. Sisto, et al
Doc. 94
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1
Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NYLES LAWAYNE WATSON, Plaintiff, vs. D.K. SISTO et al., Defendants. ____________________________/ In light of the Ninth Circuit's opinion in Rhodes v. Robinson, ___F.3d___, 2010 WL 3489777 (9th Cir. Sept. 8, 2010), the court vacates its findings and recommendations in this action filed on September 3, 2010 (Dkt. No. 92) for further consideration. Amended findings and recommendations will be filed in due course. SO ORDERED. DATED: September 22, 2010 ORDER No. 2:07-cv-01871 LKK KJN P
_____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
