Pamer v. Schwarzenegger et al
Filing
100
ORDER ADOPTING 92 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 3/29/2011. Plaintiff's 89 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED. (Marciel, M)
-CMK (PC) Pamer v. Schwarzenegger et al
Doc. 100
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules. On January 21, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations (Doc. 92) herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed. The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis. /// 1
Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LAWRENCE PAMER, Plaintiff,
No. 2:07-cv-01902-MCE-CMK-P
ORDER
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The findings and recommendations filed January 21, 2011 (ECF No. 92), are
adopted in full; and 2. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 89) is denied.
Dated: March 29, 2011 ________________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?