Pamer v. Schwarzenegger et al

Filing 118

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 12/22/11 ordering the defendants are directed to serve the suggestion of death upon the record pursuant to Rule 25. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LAWRENCE PAMER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 No. CIV S-07-1902-MCE-CMK-P vs. ORDER 14 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 / 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant 18 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants have filed a notice of Plaintiff’s death pursuant to Federal Rule 19 of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1) (Doc. 117). 20 The court notes that the suggestion of death filed with the court does not contain a 21 proof of service. The party suggesting the death of another party must serve the suggestion of 22 death on the other parties to the action and the nonparty successors or representatives of the 23 deceased. See Barlow v. Ground, 39 F.3d 231, 233 (9th Cir. 1994). Service of the notice is 24 required on all parties pursuant to Rule 5 and on nonparties pursuant to Rule 4. See Fed. R. Civ. 25 Proc. 25(a)(3). Prior to dismissing an action for failure to substitute the proper party, proper 26 notice must be provided. See Barlow, 39 F.3d at 233, Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 25 (requiring dismissal 1 1 of action by the decedent if a motion to substitute is not filed within 90 days after service of the 2 statement suggesting death). Defendants are therefore directed to serve the suggestion of death 3 upon the record pursuant to Rule 25. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 25(a)(3). 4 SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 DATED: December 22, 2011 ______________________________________ CRAIG M. KELLISON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?