Lal v. Felker et al
Filing
177
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/28/12 ORDERING 164 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are adopted in full; and 145 Motion for Default Judgment is denied. (Matson, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
AZHAR LAL,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. CIV S-07-2060 KJM EFB P
vs.
FELKER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action
18
seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate
19
Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On August 24, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations,
21
which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
22
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
24
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United
25
States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
26
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
1
1
1983). Having carefully reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to
2
be supported by the record and by the proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 24, 2012, are adopted in full;
5
and
6
2. Plaintiff’s February 23, 2012 motion for default judgment (Docket No. 145) is
7
denied.
8
DATED: September 28, 2012.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?