Lal v. Felker et al

Filing 254

ORDER ADOPTING 250 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/16/2014. Plaintiff's 5/16/2013 189 Motion for Injunction and 8/2/2013 193 Motion to Compel, construed as a Request for Preliminary Injunction, are DENIED. (Marciel, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

AZHAR LAL,

12

No. 2:07-cv-2060-KJM-EFB P
Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

FELKER, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided

19

by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On June 26, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were

21

served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings

22

and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to

23

the findings and recommendations.

24

The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602

25

F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.

26

See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed

27

the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

28

the proper analysis.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed June 26, 2014, are adopted in full; and

3

2. Plaintiff’s May 16, 2013 motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF No. 189) and

4

August 2, 2013 motion to compel (ECF No. 193), construed as a request for a preliminary

5

injunction, are denied.

6

DATED: September 16, 2014.

7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2