Ortega v. Kelly et al

Filing 47

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 2/22/2010 ORDERING that dfts' 46 request to vacate upcoming scheduling order dates is GRANTED; the court's scheduling order dates as to dispositive motions, pretrial statements and pretrial conference are VACATED; and the parties are to file a status report or stipulation for dismissal of this action w/in 60 days. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. JEFF KELLY, et. al., Defendant. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Craig S. Kellison to conduct a settlement conference at High Desert State Prison on January 11, 2010, at 3:00 p.m. On February 12, 2010, defense counsel informed the court that the parties have verbally agreed to enter into settlement. The parties anticipate filing a stipulation for dismissal of this action within sixty days. Defense counsel requests that the court vacate upcoming scheduling order dates. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendant's February 12, 2010 request to vacate upcoming scheduling order dates (Doc. No. 46) is granted; 1 ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOEL FELIX ORTEGA, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2095 DAD P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DAD:9 orte2095.sett 2. The court's scheduling order dates related to dispositive motions (February 26, 2010), pretrial statements (March 26, 2010 and April 9, 2010), and pretrial conference (April 16, 2010) are vacated. The court will issue a revised scheduling order if necessary at a future date; and 3. The parties are directed to file a status report or a stipulation for dismissal of this action within sixty days of the date of this order. DATED: February 22, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?