Marshall v. Banner Lassen Medical Center, et al
Filing
7
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Ronald S.W. Lew on 2/4/08 ADOPTING 6 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS. This action is dismissed. CASE CLOSED. (Anderson, J)
(PS) Marshall v. Banner Lassen Medical Center, et al
Doc. 7
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. BANNER LASSEN MEDICAL CENTER, MICHELLE JOY, Defendants. __________________________________/ ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GRANVILLE H. MARSHALL, JR., Plaintiff, No. CIV-S-07-2169 LEW EFB PS
On December 27, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within ten days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. \\\\\ \\\\\ 1
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. The proposed Findings and Recommendations filed December 27, 2007, are ADOPTED; and 2. This action is dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Local Rule 11-110.
Date: February 4, 2008
_______________________________ HONORABLE RONALD S.W. LEW Senior, U.S. District Court Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?