Jones v. Board of Prison Terms
Filing
10
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/6/2008 recommending that this action be dismissed for petitioner's failure to keep court apprised of his current address. 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Kenneth Jones Motion referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. Objections may be filed w/i 20 days after service of these findings and recommendations. (Waggoner, D)
(HC)Jones v. Board of Prison Terms
Doc. 10
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. BOARD OF PRISON TERMS, Respondent. / A recent court order was served on petitioner's address of record and returned by the postal service. It appears that petitioner has failed to comply with Local Rule 83-182(f), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed for petitioner's failure to keep the court apprised of his current address. See Local Rules 83-182(f) and 11-110 (E.D. Cal. 1997). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the 1
Dockets.Justia.com
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KENNETH JONES, Petitioner, No. CIV S-07-2173 MCE JFM P
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: February 6, 2008.
/ke/001 jone2173.133a
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?