Ruiz v. Kelly et al
ORDER signed by District Judge A. Howard Matz on 8/14/09 ORDERING that the Defendants' Request for an Extension of time to file a reply brief 61 is GRANTED. The Defendants have until 8/20/09 to file their reply. The Court VACATES, without prejudice to Plaintiff and the defendants jointy seeking settlement of the dispute depending on the outcome of the summary judgment MOTON, Plaintiff's MOTION. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EAST ER N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 07-2236 AHM (E.D. CAL.) BRANDON RUIZ v. KAREN KELLY, ET. AL Date August 14, 2009
Present: The Honorable Stephen Montes Deputy Clerk
A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Not Reported Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Attorneys NOT Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys NOT Present for Defendants:
Proce e dings :
On June 19, 2009, Plaintiff filed a motion for a settlement hearing. (Doc. No. 53.) Plaintiff's motion is premature in light of the defendants' motion for summary judgment and Plaintiff's timely opposition. The Court GRANTS the defendants' request for an extension to file a reply brief. (Doc No. 61.) The defendants have until August 20, 2009 to file their reply. Thus, in light of the motion for summary judgment, the Court VACATES, without prejudice to Plaintiff and the defendants jointly seeking settlement of the dispute depending on the outcome of the summary judgment motion, Plaintiff's motion. IT IS SO ORDERED.
: Initials of Preparer
C V -9 0 (06/04)
C I V I L MINUTES - GENERAL
P ag e 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?