McNeal v. Ervin, et al

Filing 10

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 01/21/09 recommending that claims against defendants R.K. Wong, R. Floto, N. Grannis, T. Felker, Rana, Lasky, Felice and Taylor be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. Objections due within 20 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. ERVIN, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983. On October 28, 2008, the court dismissed plaintiff's claims against defendants R. K. Wong, R. Floto, N. Grannis, T. Felker, Rana, Lasky, Felice and Taylor pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A, with leave to amend. The court informed plaintiff he could proceed against defendants Ervin and Evert by submitting materials for service within 20 days, but the court would construe his election so to proceed as consent to dismissal of his claims against defendants R. K. Wong, R. Floto, N. Grannis, T. Felker, Rana, Lasky, Felice and Taylor without leave to amend. On December 18, 2008, plaintiff submitted materials for service of defendants Ervin and Evert. The court finds plaintiff has consented to dismissal of claims against defendants R. K. Wong, R. Floto, N. Grannis, T. Felker, Rana, Lasky, Felice and Taylor without leave to amend. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA VERNON WAYNE McNEAL, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2240 LKK EFB P 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Accordingly, it is hereby recommended that claims against defendants R. K. Wong, R. Floto, N. Grannis, T. Felker, Rana, Lasky, Felice and Taylor be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(l). Within twenty days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Turner v. Duncan, 158 F.3d 449, 455 (9th Cir. 1998); Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: January 21, 2009. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?