Lacey v. Torruella et al
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Lloyd D. George on 9/30/2013 DISMISSING CASE. CASE CLOSED. (Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ROBERT LACEY,
8
2:07-cv-2254-LDG
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
J. TORRUELLA, et al.,
11
ORDER
Defendant.
12
13
Plaintiff Robert Lacey submitted his complaint and application to proceed in forma
14
pauperis (#1 and #2) on October 22, 2007. On April 9, 2008, Magistrate Judge Brennan
15
subsequently issued an order indicating that the application was deficient because it did not contain
16
“a certified copy of the trust fund account statement for plaintiff for the 6-month period
17
immediately preceding the filing of the complaint . . . , obtained from the appropriate official of
18
each prison at which the prisoner is or was confined.” (#5) On April 24, 2008, plaintiff submitted
19
a new application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (#6), but failed to comply with the section
20
1915(a)(2) requisite that the trust account statement be “for the 6-month period immediately
21
preceding the filing of the complaint.” Instead, he submitted a statement for the 6-month period of
22
October 1, 2007, until April 15, 2008. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Brennan granted plaintiff
23
thirty days to file an account statement for the appropriate period, and directed that failure to
24
comply with his order would result in the recommendation that the action be dismissed (#7). On
25
August 11, 2008, plaintiff filed his third document in support of the request to proceed in forma
26
pauperis (#8). A review of that document indicates that the trust fund account statement reported
1
the incorrect period of January 1, 2008, through July 30, 2008; again failing to comply with the
2
court’s order. Accordingly,
3
THE COURT HEREBY ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED.
4
5
DATED this _____ day of September, 2013.
6
7
______________________________
Lloyd D. George
United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?