Manago v. Williams, et al

Filing 120

ORDER ADOPTING 93 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 11/16/10. The 86 Motion for Protective Order, 87 Motion for Reconsideration and 88 Motion for TRO are DENIED. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
(PC) Manago v. Williams, et al Doc. 120 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. BRAD WILLIAM, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 21, 2010, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: //// 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEWART MANAGO, Plaintiff, No. 2:07cv2290-LKK-KJN-P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 21, 2010 (Dkt. No. 93), are adopted in full. 2. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 87) is denied. 3. Plaintiff's motion for protective order (Dkt. No. 86) is denied. 4. Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order (Dkt. No. 88) is denied. DATED: November 16, 2010. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?