Manago v. Williams, et al
Filing
211
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/29/11 DENYING 208 Motion to Compel; DENYING 210 Motion. Plaintiff shall refrain from filing any further documents in this court, or from corresponding with defense counsel, without prior court authorization. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
STEWART MANAGO,
11
Plaintiff,
No. 2:07-cv-2290 LKK KJN P
vs.
12
13
BRAD WILLIAMS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
ORDER
/
15
For the reasons stated in this court’s order filed December 16, 2011 (Dkt. No.
16
17
206), plaintiff’s motion to compel, filed December 27, 2011 (Dkt. No. 210), is denied. Plaintiff’s
18
separate motion, filed December 22, 2011 (Dkt. No. 208), to compel defendants’ counsel to
19
provide plaintiff with a copy of the transcript of plaintiff’s February 11, 2011 deposition, is also
20
denied. On October 28, 2011, defendants lodged with the court a copy of the subject transcript,
21
that includes a three-page “Errata Sheet” prepared and signed by plaintiff on March 31, 2011,
22
thus indicating that plaintiff already has a copy of the subject transcript. (Dkt. No. 182.) For the
23
reasons stated in the court’s prior order, plaintiff shall refrain from filing any further documents
24
////
25
////
26
////
1
1
in this court, or from corresponding with defense counsel, without prior court authorization.
2
DATED: December 29, 2011
3
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
mana2290.flw.up
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?