Manago v. Williams, et al
Filing
248
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/10/12 ordering defendant Brockett's request to file the indentified exhibits under seal 245 is granted. Plaintiff is granted an additional 14 days to 09/27/12 to file his supplemental opposition. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
STEWART MANAGO,
11
Plaintiff,
No. 2:07-cv-2290 LKK KJN P
vs.
12
13
BRAD WILLIAMS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
ORDER
/
15
Defendant Brockett requests to file under seal additional exhibits generated
16
17
pursuant to her pertinent disciplinary proceedings before the State Personnel Board. Defendant
18
contemporaneously served plaintiff with a copy of the request and exhibits. Although
19
defendant’s counsel avers that most exhibits were previously provided to both plaintiff and the
20
court, the current format provides “clarity and ease of reference” (Dkt. No. 245 at 1), which
21
appears to be accurate based on the undersigned’s review of the exhibits and summary. Pursuant
22
to this review, the undersigned finds that the submitted materials, all related to defendant’s
23
confidential personnel matters concerning issues in this case, appropriate for sealing pursuant to
24
Local Rule 141. The court further finds that plaintiff should be granted additional time to file his
25
supplemental opposition.
26
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Defendant Brockett’s request to file the identified exhibits under seal (Dkt. No.
3
245), is granted; and
2. Plaintiff is granted an additional 14 days, to September 27, 2012, to file his
4
5
supplemental opposition.
6
SO ORDERED.
7
DATED: September 10, 2012
8
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
9
10
11
mana2290.seal.2
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?