Manago v. Williams, et al

Filing 330

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/8/2015 GRANTING plaintiff's counsel three days to resubmit plaintiff's 328 motion for sanctions with counsel's signature; in the abscence of such a refiling, the motion will be stricken in its entirety. If plaintiff makes a single additional filing with the court in this action, whether in the form of a letter, a motion, a request for status, or any other document, of his own accord, rather than through appointed cou nsel, the court will immediately issue an order to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order on plaintiff by mail at his last known address. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STEWART MANAGO, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:07-cv-02290 TLN KJN P Plaintiff, ORDER v. BRAD WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding in forma pauperis and through appointed counsel, 18 in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 24, 2015, plaintiff moved 19 for sanctions against defendants based on the California Department of Corrections’ (“CDCR’s”) 20 alleged failure to send $350.00 to the court in order to satisfy the filing fee in this matter. The 21 $350.00 was allegedly provided to CDCR in the form of a money order by an attorney named 22 Emily Maloney. (See ECF No. 328.) 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 requires that “[e]very pleading, written motion, and 24 other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney’s name – or by a 25 party personally if the party is unrepresented.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 11(a). Neither of plaintiff’s 26 appointed counsel has signed the motion in question. Rule 11 further provides that “[t]he court 27 must strike an unsigned paper unless the omission is promptly corrected after being called to the 28 attorney’s or party’s attention.” Id. See also Bus. Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Commc’ns Enters., 1 1 2 Inc., 498 U.S. 544, 543 (1991) (“[W]here a required signature is missing and the omission is not 3 corrected promptly, the document will be stricken.”). Accordingly, the motion for sanctions will 4 be stricken in its entirety unless plaintiff’s counsel promptly resubmits the motion with a 5 signature. Plaintiff is nevertheless advised that the motion appears meritless, and is likely to be 6 denied even if resubmitted with counsel’s signature. 7 Plaintiff has been warned on numerous occasions that he should “cease filing any 8 documents in this case unless expressly directed by this court.” (ECF No. 302 at 2.) Plaintiff has 9 been unwilling to heed these warnings, and continues to bombard the court with frivolous and 10 unnecessary filings that drain scant time and resources. It has therefore become necessary for the 11 court to order that if plaintiff makes even a single additional filing of any type in this action of his 12 own accord, rather than proceeding through his appointed counsel, an order to show cause will 13 immediately issue regarding why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff is 14 further informed that, in determining whether cause has been shown, the court will disregard any 15 argument that plaintiff was unable to comply with this order due to his mental health status, as 16 plaintiff has proven himself entirely capable of complying with numerous other court orders 17 during the course of this action. 18 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 19 1. Plaintiff’s counsel is granted three days’ leave to resubmit plaintiff’s motion for 20 sanctions with counsel’s signature. In the absence of such a refiling, the motion for 21 sanctions (ECF No. 328) will be stricken in its entirety for failure to comply with 22 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. 23 2. If plaintiff makes a single additional filing with the court in this action, whether in the 24 form of a letter, a motion, a request for status, or any other document, of his own 25 accord, rather than through appointed counsel, the court will immediately issue an 26 order to show cause as to why this action should not be dismissed with prejudice under 27 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to comply with a court order. 28 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on plaintiff by mail at 2 1 2 3 his last known address. Dated: September 8, 2015 4 5 /mana2290.deny.2nd 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?