Graham v. Runnels, et al

Filing 83

STIPULATION and ORDER to modify scheduling order signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 09/12/11 ordering ( Discovery due by 11/9/2011 and Dispositive Motions filed by 11/23/2011). (Plummer, M)

1

6

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
James L. Day (Bar No. 197158)
Brian D. Berry (Bar No. 229893)
Brendan K. Kelleher (Bar No. 275883)
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: +1.415.395.8095
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]
Email: [e-mail]

7

Attorneys for Plaintiff Levon Graham

8

Additional Counsel On Signature Block

2
3
4
5

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SACRAMENTO DIVISION JUDICIAL DISTRICT

13
14

LEVON GRAHAM,
Plaintiff,

15
16
17

CASE NO. CIV S-07-2291 GGH P

v.
D. L. RUNNELS, ET AL.,
Defendants.

18

STIPULATION, REQUEST TO MODIFY
THE SCHEDULING ORDER, AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
DISCOVERY DEADLINE AND
DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE FOR FILING
DISPOSITIVE MOTION
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:

19

October 26, 2007
None

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SF\873266.2
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case Number: 2:07-CV-2291 LKK GGH P

1

STIPULATION AND REQUEST TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING ORDER

2

A scheduling order may be modified upon a showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P.

3

16(b). Good cause exists when the deadline cannot be met despite due diligence. Johnson v.

4

Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992).

5

WHEREAS the Court, in its June 13, 2011 Order, set the discovery deadline for October

6

3, 2011 and the deadline for Defendants to file and/or re-notice any dispositive motion for

7

October 17, 2011;

8
9
10
11

WHEREAS the parties have completed three of the six depositions that the Court ordered
on June 13 but face scheduling conflicts that will prevent them from scheduling the remaining
three depositions on or before the current discovery deadline;
THEREFORE, the parties, through their respective counsel of record, hereby agree and

12

STIPULATE that:

13

1.

The discovery deadline shall be extended until November 9, 2011; and

14

2.

The deadline for defendants to file and/or re-notice any dispositive motion be

15

extended until November 23, 2011.

16

Dated: September 1, 2011

LATHAM & WATKINS LLP

17
18

By /s/
Brendan K. Kelleher
Attorneys for Plaintiff Levon Graham

19
20
21

Dated: September 1, 2011

22

KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California
TRACY S. HENDRICKSON
Supervising Deputy Attorney General

23
24

By
Jaime M. Ganson
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants Kopec and Martin

25
26
27
28
SF\873266.2
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case Number: 2:07-CV-2291 LKK GGH P

1

ORDER

2

The discovery deadline currently scheduled for October 3, 2011, is hereby

3

continued to November 9, 2011. The deadline for Defendants to file and/or re-notice any

4

dispositive motion currently scheduled for October 17, 2011, is hereby continued to November

5

23, 2011.

6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 12, 2011

7

/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
______________________________
Honorable Gregory G. Hollows

8
9

Grah2291stp

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SF\873266.2
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Case Number: 2:07-CV-2291 LKK GGH P