Graham v. Runnels, et al
Filing
87
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 10/17/11 granting 86 Motion for receipt of telephone calls. Salinas Valley State Prison shall provide plaintiff Levon Graham confidential telephone acces on the following dates and time for purposes of receiving telephone calls from counsel that shall not exceed 90 minutes duration. (See order for further details) (Plummer, M)
1
6
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
James L. Day (Bar No. 197158)
Brian D. Berry (Bar No. 229893)
Brendan K. Kelleher (Bar No. 275883)
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, California 94111-6538
Telephone: +1.415.391.0600
Facsimile: +1.415.395.8095
Email: jim.day@lw.com
Email: brian.berry@lw.com
Email: brendan.kelleher@lw.com
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff Levon Graham
2
3
4
5
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SACRAMENTO DIVISION JUDICIAL DISTRICT
12
CASE NO. CIV S-07-2291 LKK GGH P
13
14
LEVON GRAHAM,
15
16
17
ORDER REGARDING LEVON
GRAHAM’S RECEIPT OF TELEPHONE
CALLS FROM COUNSEL
Plaintiff,
v.
D. L. RUNNELS, ET AL.,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
SF\878473.1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
CASE NO. CIV S-07-2291 LKK GGH P
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING LEVON GRAHAM’S
RECEIPT OF TELEPHONE CALLS FROM COUNSEL
1
Plaintiff’s counsel has requested that the court order Salinas Valley State Prison
2
(“SVSP”) to provide five, confidential telephonic discussions between counsel and client for
3
purposes of preparing an opposition to summary judgment pursuant to the following schedule:
4
•
Wednesday, November 2, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.;
5
•
Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.;
6
•
Wednesday, November 30, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.;
7
•
Monday, December 5, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.; and
8
•
Wednesday, December 7, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.
9
Counsel asks that each call be for a proposed maximum 90 minute period. The remaining
10
defendant doctors have not responded to oppose this request, although the logistics of such
11
would not appear to be within their purview. The litigation coordinator has refused to arrange
12
these telephone conferences without court order (she permitted one already).
13
In the absence of a response from defendants or the litigation coordinator, the court will
14
not deny all requests. However, it does appear that the amount of requests are excessive in that
15
each request will require the prison to interrupt normal programming for these special telephone
16
calls. Moreover, plaintiff’s counsel does not indicate why confidential mail cannot suffice for
17
some contact. Finally, a good deal of the opposition will not center around plaintiff’s
18
allegations, but will involve the medical record and any experts who opine on such.
19
For the following reasons:
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Salinas Valley State Prison shall provide Plaintiff,
21
Levon Graham (P74846), confidential telephone access on the following dates and times for
22
purposes of receiving telephone calls from counsel that shall not exceed ninety (90) minutes in
23
duration:
24
•
Wednesday, November 2, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.;
25
•
Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.; and
26
•
Monday, December 5, 2011 at 2:00 p.m.; and
27
28
2
SF\878473.1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
CASE NO. CIV S-07-2291 LKK GGH P
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING LEVON GRAHAM’S
RECEIPT OF TELEPHONE CALLS FROM COUNSEL
1
If despite good faith efforts to comply with this schedule SVSP cannot make Mr. Graham
2
available for any of these scheduled calls, SVSP must provide counsel with reasonable advance
3
notice of the conflict and cooperate with counsel to reschedule the call to be held within 24 hours
4
of the scheduled time.
5
Plaintiff’s counsel shall serve this order on the litigation coordinator.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
DATED: October 17, 2011
9
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
___________________________________
GREGORY G. HOLLOWS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
12
Grah2291.ord
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
SF\878473.1
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
CASE NO. CIV S-07-2291 LKK GGH P
[PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING LEVON GRAHAM’S
RECEIPT OF TELEPHONE CALLS FROM COUNSEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?