Tompkins v. Stephens et al
Filing
97
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/3/12 ORDERING that Plaintiff file his pretrial statement and any motions necessary to obtain the attendance of incarcerated witnesses at trial within 30 days; defendants to file their pretrial statement within 14 days thereafter; and plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely file his pretrial statement will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SHAWN MARSHALL TOMPKINS,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
No. CIV S-07-2346 GEB EFB P
STEPHENS, et al.,
Defendants.
14
ORDER
/
15
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42
16
17
U.S.C. § 1983. On September 27, 2011, the assigned district judge adopted the undersigned’s
18
recommendation that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be denied and set a schedule for
19
the parties to file their pretrial statements. That order directed plaintiff to file his pretrial
20
statement within thirty days. On October 5, 2011, the undersigned directed the parties to submit
21
confidential settlement conference statements within fifteen days. Plaintiff submitted the
22
required settlement statement but, to date, has not filed his pretrial statement.
23
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:
24
1. Plaintiff shall file his pretrial statement and any motions necessary to obtain the
25
attendance of incarcerated witnesses at trial within thirty (30) days.
26
////
1
1
2. Defendants shall file their pretrial statement within fourteen (14) days thereafter.
2
3. Plaintiff is admonished that failure to timely file his pretrial statement will result in a
3
recommendation that this action be dismissed.
4
DATED: January 3, 2012.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?