Rezaei v. Sisto

Filing 33

ORDER signed by District Judge Ricardo S. Martinez on 3/29/11 re 30 ORDERING that the Court directs Respondent to file opposition to the motion, if any, on or before April 29, 2011. Petitioner may file a reply on or before May 6, 2011. The motion shall be noted on the Court's calendar for May 13, 2011. (Duong, D)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER - 1 Respondent. This matter is before the Court for consideration of Petitioner's motion to alter and amend the judgment. Dkt. # 30. Respondent has not opposed the motion as it was not noted for consideration on the Court's calendar. Dkt. # 31. The Court finds that the motion was timely filed and warrants consideration. Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). Accordingly, the Court directs Respondent to file opposition to the motion, if any, on or before April 29, 2011. Petitioner may file a reply on or before May 6, 2011. The motion shall be noted on the Court's calendar for May 13, 2011. It is SO ORDERED. DATE: March 29, 2011 v. D. K. SISTO, Warden, NIMA REZAEI, Petitioner, CASE NO. 2:07-CV-2373-RSM ORDER ON RULE 59 MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

A

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE