Williams v. Walker et al

Filing 68

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 09/01/10 ordering plaintiff's motion 65 is denied without prejudice. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
(PC) Williams v. Walker et al Doc. 68 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. J. WALKER, et al., Defendants. / Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 5, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion for judicial intervention (Doc. 65), in which he asked the court to intervene and order officials at the Kern Valley State Prison to return his legal materials to him. Plaintiff indicated that, since June 30, 2010, prison officials had denied him access to case files, exhibits, and other documents bearing on this case. Defendants opposed the motion as moot, based on correctional officer J. Amavisca's sworn statement that, after being inadvertently sent to the wrong prison, all plaintiff's legal materials were returned to him on August 6, 2010. The undersigned agrees that the motion is moot and that plaintiff has not been unduly harmed by the short delay in receiving his legal materials. \\\\\ \\\\\ 1 Dockets.Justia.com IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN WESLEY WILLIAMS, Plaintiff, No. CIV S-07-2385 WBS GGH P ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 GGH Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that plaintiff's motion (Doc. 65) is denied without prejudice. DATED: September 1, 2010 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows GREGORY G. HOLLOWS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE will2385.ord2 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?