Kilgore v. Mandeville et al
Filing
102
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/27/2011 ORDERING pltf's attorney's request for authority to incur costs regarding obtaining documents is GRANTED. (Crouch, J)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Kilgore
Plaintiff(s)
vs.
Mandeville et al
Defendants.
No.
2:07-cv-02485-GEB-KJN
REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO INCUR
COSTS (APPOINTED COUNSEL) AND
REQUEST FOR PAYMENT
______________________/
REQUEST OF PRO BONO FOR PRE-APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES
Complete this form and return it to the court (with two copies) for approval prior to incurring the
cost for which reimbursement is requested.
I,
Edward Misleh
, attorney for plaintiff(s), declare as follows:
September 13, 2011
I was appointed to represent plaintiff(s) in this action on
, by the
Magistrate Judge Newman
Honorable
, United States District Judge/Magistrate.
I believe that the following course of action is reasonably necessary to the prosecution of this
action:
$200.00 (approximately) to download documents from the PACER system. I have already incurred $142.00
for most of these documents to download 100 of the documents on file.
(e.g., deposition of _______________, defendant herein).
I have made reasonable inquiry and believe that the cost of this course of action will not exceed
the amount of $
.
$200.00
I therefore request that this court authorize the expenditure in an amount not to exceed that stated
above for the completion of this contemplated course of action.
REQUEST OF PRO BONO FOR PRE-APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES - PAGE 2
Case Number:
2:07-cv-02485-GEB-KJN
The following payments of costs have been heretofore approved in this matter:
Amount
Approved
Amount
Paid
Purpose
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signed this
23
day of
September
, 20 11 , at
Sacramento
, California.
Edward Misleh, CA State Bar # 273645
615 Tenth Street, Sacramento, CA 95814
Attorney for Plaintiff(s)
The above expenditure is
x
Approved
Denied
Or,
Good cause appearing therefore, this matter is set for discovery conference, pursuant
to rule _______, on _______________________, at ___________, ___.M. in Courtroom
Number_______.
Dated:
September 27, 2011
United States District Judge/Magistrate
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?