Kilgore v. Mandeville et al

Filing 110

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 03/01/12 ordering that the deadline is extended for defense counsel to serve, on plaintiff's counsel, each defendant's declaration, as ordered by the court on 01/06/12; defense counsel shall, on or before 03/16/12 file a declaration demonstrating compliance with this requirement, or an explanation why this deadline cannot reasonably be met. (See order for further details)(Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

IVAN KILGORE,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:07-cv-2485 GEB KJN P

vs.
RICHARD MANDEVILLE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

ORDER
/

17

Counsel for defendants has filed a “Notice of Partial Compliance With the Court’s

18

Order Filed January 6, 2012.” (Dkt. No. 108.) Defendants’ counsel states therein that defendants

19

have produced to plaintiff or his counsel (counsel was appointed in September 2011), all medical

20

records in defense counsel’s possession, and a copy of plaintiff’s deposition transcript. In

21

addition, defense counsel requested and obtained, from the Litigation Office at California State

22

Prison- Sacramento, copies of plaintiff’s relevant medical records and administrative grievances,

23

which defense counsel forwarded to plaintiff’s counsel on February 22, 2012. Defense counsel

24

states, however, that she requires additional time to obtain the declarations of each defendant, as

25

ordered by the court.

26

////

1

For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the deadline is extended

2

for defense counsel to serve, on plaintiff’s counsel, each defendant’s declaration, as ordered by

3

the court on January 6, 2012; defense counsel shall, on or before March 16, 2012, file a

4

declaration demonstrating compliance with this requirement, or an explanation why this deadline

5

cannot reasonably be met.

6

The parties are reminded that each counsel shall, on or before March 30, 2012, file

7

a further status report, that states: (1) whether any further discovery is required in this case; (2)

8

whether any party intends to file a nondispositive pretrial motion, e.g. the reinstatement of

9

previously dismissed defendants (but see Dkt. No. 107 at 2 n.2 (noting high threshold for such

10

amendment)); (3) suggested dates for discovery cut-off; and (4) suggested deadlines for filing

11

dispositive motions.

12
13

SO ORDERED.
DATED: March 1, 2012

14
15

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

kilg2485.eot.disc.cmplnc.